顯示具有 leon hindle 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章
顯示具有 leon hindle 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章

2010年2月25日 星期四

From Lehman Minibond To Oracle Capital Limited

The Lehman Minibonds were single handedly created and arranged by Lehman Brothers Asia Pacific. The main contributor was the CDO & Structured Credit Group headed by Leon Hindle.

Oracle Capital Limited was described in the "The other side of structured credit of The Asset October 2009 by Chito Santiago (http://www.theasset.com/article/17587.html)" as follows:

[
When the saga of Lehman Brothers started to unravel and eventually led to its spectacular demise in September last year, two of its senior bankers, Leon Hindle and Fredric Teng, were already contemplating lives outside of the firm – and outside of investment banking for that matter. After all, the sellside was gone as the investor base was shattered at that point in time. Perhaps it was opportune to move to the other side of the fence – into the buyside.

Hindle used to be managing director and head of collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) and structured credit trading group for the Asia-Pacific region at Lehman Brothers. He was also a member of Lehman’s Asia-Pacific fixed income management committee and the global credit products management team.

(...)

Together, they formed Oracle Capital Limited, the Hong Kong-based sub-investment advisor of Oracle Investment Fund SPC focussing on structured credit asset class . Their motivation came at a time when investment banking was changing significantly. In every asset class, it looks as though there is a huge opportunity to move to the buyside. Teng says they have already obtained an asset management licence from the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission, and are currently applying for an advisory licence and expect the process to be concluded soon.

In setting up Oracle, Hindle and Teng followed the footsteps of fellow investment bankers who have decided to leave the industry and strike it on their own so as to take advantage of the market dislocation. For instance, Jeremy Amias, a 23-year veteran at Citi who left the US firm as head of fixed income, currencies and commodities for Asia-Pacific, has joined hands with another former Citi banker Charlie Berman to set up Amias Berman and Company, a fixed income advisory, origination and brokerage firm.

(...)

While markets in other asset classes have witnessed rallies, this seems to be less the case for structured credit and according to Hindle, this situation may last for another four to five years. Structured credit is pretty much the whole gamut of products, ranging from single name credit linked notes to balance sheet collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) and synthetic CDOs. “These assets are not straight-forward,” notes Teng. “There is a lot of work to be done before you can understand what is going on. And the barrier to entry is high, you need a team of credit derivatives specialists and also a lot of investment in technology. We think we are the only outfit wholly dedicated to this asset class in Asia. We see a lot of opportunities.”

Hindle adds: “Asian investors are really in a difficult position, if you like, to make decisions about how to manage these things going forward given the overall environment now. It is probably less the case for the European or US investors because they do have a greater sense of the underlying risks in these products. That is why I think the opportunity in Asia is present for us. There are people who are running similar funds in the US and Europe, but there is not really anyone on the ground in this region with the same focus.”

(...)

Unlike CLOs, which have rallied and boast a deeper liquidity now, synthetic CDOs did not have a chance to rally to the same extent, because there are not that many pure-end buyers and because, in some cases, the risks of the transactions are tied up to the riskiest names in the former investment grade universe such as the monolines. “The kind of valuation for certain deals at this point in time, if they are managed right, should be able to generate a pretty healthy return despite the lack of liquidity in that area,” Hindle points out.

(...)

]

According to its website, Oracle Captial Limited is located on the 20th Floor, Central Tower of Central, and its Chief Investment Officer is Leon Hindle.

Leon Hindle and his CDO & Structured Credit Group surely have done an excellent jobs for boosting Lehman Brothers revenue and his own bonus in selling synthetic CDO/CDS at the cost of Hong Kong retail banks' clients with the innovation product "Lehman Minibond".


Lehman Brothers sold CDO to their clients by taking advantages of the CDO boom. Lehman Brothers also sold synthetic CDO / CDS to the clients to provide insurance for the event of CDOs bust. However, Lehman Brothers did not want to be the insurance-provider on the related CDOs.

What did Lehman Brothers do? One of the solution is the Lehman Minibond.

Lehman Brothers Asia-Pacific region created the Lehman Minibond which was essentially providing credit default insurances for a basket of reference entities. According to "Derivatives Week" (Dec.8,2008), Leon Hindle oversaw Lehman's origination and distribution of all structured credit in the Asia-Pacific, including the strucuring of CDOS linked to its controversial minibond series.
In 2003, from the poor sales results of Minibond Series 6, the Minibond creator realized that Hong Kong retail banks' clients are not keen in a product that is credit linked to 150 reference entities. The Minibond creator quickly switched to a smoother strategy. They added a facade to the Minibond and prominently promoted the Minibond as "Credite Linked with 7 well-known Companies". While Hong Kong retail banks' clients thought that they bought into a Lehman Minibond which was credited linked to 7 well-known companies, they did not realize that they have actually become the ultimate synthetic CDO /CDS insurance provider, to provide insurance on the default event of a basket of undisclosed 125-194 reference entities. It's the insurance premium for the undisclosed 125-194 reference entities (Synthetic CDO) that pays the Minibond interest.

With all the experience and in-depth knowledge on CDO / Synthetic CDO / CDS, knowing how little that people understand and can be fooled by financial experts on such innovation products, Leon Hindle and his company Oracle Capital Limited surely would provide excellent service to their clients.

Related blogs on Leon Hindle: " Why did Lehman Asia head of structure division Leon Hindle Lie "
(http://minibondvictim.blogspot.com/2009/06/lehman-asia-head-of-structure-division.html)

Watch out, if you are considering to buy a product from the experts of CDO / CLO / Synthetic CDO. The product may have a conservative branding name and a beautiful facade, but the true features & risks of the product probably can be anything that is totally different from the branding name & the prominent facade.

2010年2月24日 星期三

The former Lehman Asia Pacific CDO & Structured Credit Team

Who was the creator of the Minibond ?
The product was created by the CDO & Structured Credit Asia Pacific of Lehman Brothers.

Who is Leon Hindle ?
Loen Hindle was Managing Director and Head of CDO & Structured Credit, Asia Pacific, Lehman Brothers.
According to "Derivatives Week" (Dec.8,2008), Leon Hindle oversaw Lehman's origination and distribution of all structured credit in the Asia-Pacific, including the strucuring of CDOS linked to its controversial minibond series.

Related blogs on Leon Hindle: "Why did Lehman Asia head of structure division Leon Hindle Lie"
http://minibondvictim.blogspot.com/2009/06/lehman-asia-head-of-structure-division.html

Other Senior members in the Lehman Brothers Asia Pacific for CDO & Structured Credit products related may include:

George Sun: is Managing Director and Head of Global Credit Products Sales for Lehman Brothers in Asia ex-Japan. Mr. Sun heads up a team that is responsible for the distribution of all credit products including money markets, high grade credit, high yield credit, loans, private placements, structured credit, CDOs, and emerging market assets.

Ian Croft: is a senior vice president and is responsible for corporate credit securitisation opportunities in Asia ex-Japan, as well marketing and distribution of structured credit products in Singapore and South East Asia.

Patrick Kaye is a Senior Vice President, responsible for Lehman Brothers’ Principal and Structured Finance practice in non-Japan Asia. He and the group arrange securitization financings on behalf of clients as well as asset-based principal investments on behalf of the Firm.

Tay Teck How is a Vice President, in the CDO & Structured Credit, Asia Pacific, Lehman Brothers.

Steve Baker is a Senior Vice President in the CLO Banking group at Lehman Brothers US. Steve is focused on origination, structuring and placement of corporate credit securitizations, CLOs and related products.

2009年6月18日 星期四

Why did Lehman Asia head of structure division Leon Hindle Lie

News from
"Septermber 25, 2006 Derivatives Week"

[Lehman Launches Extendable CDO Deal

Lehman brothers in Asia has launched a single-tranche synthetic collateralized debt obligation with an extendable feature in a bid to boost returns. "It's purely for yeild enchancement," said Leon Hindle, senior v.p. in Hong Kong, noting the proliferation of extendable and callable features embedded in CDOs due to the curent tight-spread environment.
The deal, dubbed Beryl Finance Series 2006-10, and rated AAA by Fitch Ratings, is referenced to a USD 14.31 billion portfolio comprised of a 155 default-swaps with USD 114 million in credit-linked notes being structured. In the transaction, orriginally targeted for three-years, Lehman has the right, not obligation, to extend the length of the transaction to a final maturity of seven years. As Lehman is the credit protection buyer, it would look to extend the deal out if spreds go wider, effectively allowing it to pay protection at locked-in cheaper levels than available in the market.

Hindle added the deal will be sold to a mix of investos via direct sales and third-party distributors in Asia.
]

===========================

Leon Hindle was the head of Lehman Asia Structure Division which was responsible for all the Lehman Minibond sold in Asia (Hong Kong, Singapore, Taiwan, Australia).

The above Beryl Finance Series 2006-10 in the news was referring to the Minibond Series #27 CDO Collateral (which was USD $114,465,000 for Series #27 A & B in USD) .

雷曼亚洲安排了迷债及迷债最为隐藏之部分:合成CDO。雷曼亚洲让迷债发行商 (SPV) Pacific International Finance 买入雷曼自己安排的(以上新闻中所提之)合成CDO。雷曼亞洲之結構產品部門主管 Leon Hindle 卻在新聞發佈上講:此產品是“通過直接銷售和第三者分銷商賣給各類投資者”

Leon Hindle 新聞發佈上的言行:

- 掩盖了此产品其实是100%全数直接卖给Pacific International Finance,是雷曼亚洲安排 Pacific International Finance 作为迷债抵押品买入的。
- 掩蓋了此產品是為雷曼迷債抵押品而設計的事實,
- 掩蓋了此產品跟雷曼迷你債券的關係 。
- 掩蓋了雷曼一手操縱此產品之買賣雙方之事實。
- 掩蓋了此產品是面向香港的零售客戶們銷售的事實。


Lehman Asia arranged the Minibond and knew exactly that SPV Pacific International Finance Limited was the SOLE buyer of this USD 114 million worth of Synthetic-CDO (comprised of 155 CDS) portfolio. It was Lehman Asia who arranged the deal for both buy-side (Pacific International Finance, owned by HSBC) and sell-side (Beryl Finance, an SPV owned by Lehman).

Why did Leon Hindle, the head of Lehman Asia Structure Division, claim that " the deal will be sold to a mix of investos via direct sales and third-party distributors in Asia."?

He knew very well that there was no mix of investors at all, there was only a pre-arranged investor, that is, the Pacific International Finance which was the Minibond Issuer. The Minibond was sold to retail clients via banks in Hong Kong, with the prominent "Credit-Linked to 7 well-known Companies".

Why did he lie about the buyer and the nature of the deal (arrangement) ?
What did he try to hide?
What was he afraid of ?


In the MInibond Issue Prospectus, there was no information to mention about the 155 CDS or the fact that the so-called minibond collateral (in fact, the underlying securities) was selling 155 CDS insurance, and was not invested into any real debt.

In the 2003-2008 period, in all the MInibond Issue Prospectus, there was no information to mention about the 100+ CDS or the fact that the so-called minibond collateral (in fact, the underlying securities) was credit linked to a portolio of 100+ (usually 125-190) reference entities. It was never specifically mentioned that the underly securities was not invested into any real debt of the 7 well-known reference entities.

(Click here for information related to Minibond Series #27 and General Minibond Information).

Related reading:
- From Lehman Minibond To Oracle Capital Limited

- SEC Sues Goldman Sachs, Alleging Fraud in CDO Tied to Subprime